Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Designing Endgame Content in the Diablo Universe - Part 2 of 2


Designing Endgame Content in the Diablo Universe

            In this post, I will first be taking a look at what is considered to be endgame content by the majority of Diablo players versus what the developers have seemingly designed as Diabo 3's current endgame content, and why the two do not coiencede with eachother.  After that I will dicussing various game design factors that are limiting to the end game content and then moving on to design choices that promote end game content and the longevity of Diablo 3.  Finally I will be speculating on redesigning Diablo 3's end content and showing ways in which future content could be created without negatively influencing any current or future content.


Diablo Fan's Endgame Content - It's Over Nine Thousand!!!!!!
            For the majority of Diablo players and for 99.9% of the diehard fans the endgame content of any Diablo game is not defeating the hardest boss, or clearing the story on the hardest difficulty.  The endgame goal of players is all about the power, the gear, creating the strongest, most perfect character possible and resting smugly knowing that yours is better than everyone else's.  That drive to perfection, to create the ultimate min/maxed character is what kept Diablo 2 alive for years and years.  It’s what kept players farming for endless hours and it is what made that farming fun.  Getting that peice of gear that was even just +1 stat closer to perfection made all the difference in the world to hardcore Diablo players while getting a legendary at all was what caused the more casual crowd to get excited.  Gear, was the true endgame content for Diablo players.

What Seems to Be Diablo 3's Endgame Content - Moar Numbers = Moar Content
            Currently in Diablo 3, it seems that the developers have intened for Inferno difficulty to be the endgame content of the game.  At a single player pace, the difficulty of it lends itself to taking the average player weeks, maybe even months of farming to make it through a few hours worth of content.   The developers want you to be playing their game for a long period of time to be able to see all of the work and content (beautiful content in my opinion) that they have dedicated so much of their time to and to enjoy your time spent doing so.  In the case of Diablo 3, their solution to this was the Inferno difficulty and they tuned the numbers (and only the numbers) as such to be the endgame content of their game, lasting for a long while.

Player Desires Conflictig with Designer's Goals - PvD
            From the designer stand point, the endgame begins when players hit level 60 and the endgame content is Inferno.  From the player standpoint, the endgame begins when they are able to start making thier character as powerful as can be and the content for that is gear, specifically the being able to obtain the best gear possible.  See the conflict?  The game designers want players to beat something while players want to be able to create something. There is nothing wrong with different goals; sometimes they even happen to fall in sync with each other creating a better experience all around, so what went wrong with Diablo 3?  The difficulty of Inferno has actually barred players from reaching their goal.  The design goal of the developers has prevented players from being able to accomplish there desires.  It is this brick wall dropped in front of players that is at the core of their displeasure.  Not only has Inferno blocked players, but it has forced them onto paths that few enjoy, compounding their frustration.

Patch 1.03 - Bandaid Fixes
            As the new patch is scheduled to be coming out soon, I'd like to take a few moments and sidetrack to go over a couple of the changes.  One change that I highly approve of is champion packs guarenteed to drop a rare with full Nephalim Valor stacks.  Rares are simply more exciting than blues and there is no guarentee they will be any good.  Even if Blizzard were to lower the chance for great modifiers on them, the overall player experience would still improve.  Finding a rare and the possibilities when identify them tickles the players pleasure senses way more than blue quality of loot does and I feel that this is a very positive change.
            The next two changes I will discuss feel as if a bandaid is placed on the problems rather than actually being addressed.  The first of these, the lowering of health and damage of Inferno monsters is a step in the right direction.  The tuning of Inferno is siply way too high and the numbers, without a doubt, need to be lowered.  However, I call this a bandaid fix because it does not addressed the underlying problems of Inferno, that, while the numbers make it difficult, Inferno is very boring and lacks challenge.  The last change, changing the item level drop rates so that Act III/IV gear can drop in Act I and more often in Act II, is a huge step in the wrong direction to me.  It promotes the idea that overgearing the content is the way to go and that it was never intended to be beaten with gear relavent to the content.  Also, while it does allow players to reach their goal of obtaining the best gear possible, it feels cheapened when it is avaiable at such an early act, almost of if it’s being handed out.  It also removes alot of the need players feel to progress through Inferno difficulty.  It is much easier and much more efficient to farm Act I than it  is to try to progress through Act II and beyond, and without incentive, players will endlessly farm Act I until they overgear the rest of the Acts and are able to completely stomp it.


Creating Enjoyable End Game Content - I'm Not Addicted, I Can Quit Anytime
            In any game, the main focus is (or at least should be) creating enjoyable content for players.  In an online game, the focus will shift slightly putting more of an emphasis on creating enjoyable end game content.  Designers accomplish this by first deciding on a goal for their players then move on to determine the ways players will go about this.  With games that are sequels however (especially online games), the players already have their own goals for the game in mind and expect them to be the same as the previous game.  When designers change this goal in between games, it forces players not only to understand a new goal, but to throw away the goals that had been solidifying in their minds for years.  While it is possible that a game could be designed so well that the change comes as a welcome shock, more often than not this is not the case.  Unfortunately, this is the camp that Diablo 3 has fallen into.
            So how do you create enjoyable end game content for Diablo 3?  First you have to understand the goals of the players who have been playing and in love with Diablo 2 for years and years.  Then designers must decided if this goal should remain the same or if a new goal should take over, in the case of Diablo, the goal in the player mindset is so strong and in this case so enjoyable to players, that it should have been left untouched.  Once designers understand the goal their game should be aiming for, the questions become what works and what does not work in creating a postive, enjoyable experience as players progress to this goal.
            From this point on I will begin to talk specifically about Diablo 3 and its elements.  First about what elements are limiting the end game, then what elements need to be limited, and finally how positive end game content can be created.

Story Limitations - One Beautiful World Thrown Out the Door
            On most players first time through Diablo they will sit and listen to the story.  Each new quest, cutscene, and bit of diablogue pulls them deeper into the world and by the end of normal they are happy with the experience they were a part of.  After that first time through though, the story ceases to become important having turned simply into people to click and and esc buttons to press.  The story has become irrelavent to the game and in essence needs to be thrown in the trash and pushed out of developer’s minds.  Sticking to the flow the story has set out, can cause potential design paths for the end game to be ignored.
            *Quick note, story progression is fine for Normal through Hell, but I feel that in Inferno it should have been removed.

Limiting the Difficulty - Fences, Walls, and Gates, Oh My!
            Most players enjoy a difficult game and don't think much of easy ones.  In fact one of the major things players asked for was for the difficulty of Diablo to be significantly increased.  However, the difficulty of Inferno took things a bit too far.  Suddenly the difficulty of Diablo 3 had become a wall, blocking players from their goal, and nobody likes running into a brick wall.  In Diablo 3, difficulty must be designed in a way that is challenging and fun to the player while still allowing steady progression at a decent pace toward their ultimate goal.  It cannot be designed in such a way to halt progress; therefore limits must be placed on how "tough" monsters can actually be designed to be

Limiting the Auction House - The Gear that Keeps on Giving
            Diablo 3 is the type of game that lends itself to having an auction house, however when left unchecked (as it currently is) things will get out of control.  At the moment it is quite possible that the save peice of gear has been bought and sold on the auction house over 100 times.  Gear is constantly being bough, used, and resold.  This recycling of gear needs to be stopped.  The auction house is becoming flooded by powerful items that will never dissappear and there is no system in place to keep this in check.  Without some kind of limiting control the auction house will quickly get out of control, holding ever growing quantities of every item possible.  As the auction house grows and grows the value of the endgame gear and thereby the endgame content will continue to diminish.  Something has to change.  Honestly, I think it will talk several steps each new one's effects evaluated before a solid solution surfaces, but I think that a good first step is to make anything bought off the auction house bound to your account.  This would make purchases more meaningful and cause each one to effectively remove that item from the market permantly, reducing flooding.

Redesigning Inferno - We Can Rebuild It, We Have the Technology
            In my previous post (link at bottom) I spent a decent portion of time talking about the current difficulty of Inferno and its flaws.  To recap, Inferno is barring the way to the player's goals for Diablo 3's endgame.  The difficulty is purely in numbers, creating walls that do not provide any challenge, only frustration.  This has caused players to be forced to farm the lower tiers of gear, something that is considered by most players to be work and not play.  For the next several sections I will be taking a look at how to redesign Inferno in such a way that it is fun, challengeing, and fresh.

Creating an Enjoyable Challenge - Working Up a Sweat
                        For the past 3 difficulties and last 60 levels, players have worked their way through Diablo 3's Acts.  The content has been seen multiple times and very little of it has changed.  However, players were accompanied by a sense of ever increasing strength and a constant stream of new variations of skills to play with.  So while the content stayed the same, players were kept entertained and this made the process enjoyable.  At the end of Hell, the path to level 60 had been reached and the prospect of Inferno loomed before them.  This is a grand milestone, the start of the real game for most players and it should be treated at such.  Inferno should redefine the game experience that players had currently been having.  No longer entertained by leveling up while moving through old content, the gameplay and content must change, giving players a variety of options to keep things feeling fresh and providing a level of difficulty that challenges players to find ways to overcome and deal with without feeling shoved against a wall.  Players should be able to work at and think through the challenges, like solving a puzzle and not feel that they are trying to beat a brick wall with a stick, making no progress at all.  Players need things to learn.
            Dealing with Numbers - What I Learned from Sesame Street
                        We all learned our numbers in grade school, 2 is bigger than 1, 5 than 10, 9374202384 than 25, and applying that knowledge to games is childs play.  Bigger numbers beat smaller numbers.  When it comes to difficulty, difficulty by numbers is extremly boring and provides no challenge to players.  Challenge and enjoyment comes when we are able to use smaller numbers to overcome larger ones.  Yes there needs to be a threshold, you shouldn't be able to clear content in all white level 20 gear, but it should not be so high that you can't make do with what gear you've picked up along the way.  Allowing players to overcome challenges by learning them, or by coming up with creative solutions is what appeals to players about diffculty.  Using there brain to come up with techniques to overcome whats been put in their way.  Lack of gear should almost never limit progression, but rather an abudance of gear should create ease of play.
                        In Diablo 3 there are some types of number difficulty that players find appropriate and add to the user experience and there are some types that players hate and should almost never happen.  Getting one-shot is an example of this.  Diablo 3 should have abilities that kill players in a single hit, but how that is done is very important.  Nobody wants to be killed by a small handful of white damage from generic auto attacks, let alone be killed in a single one of these hits, there is nothing fun or exciting about it.  On the flip side, players do enjoy when there are elements that can and will kill them in a single hit.  A few examples, Dark Berserker's charge up swing, arcane orbs, or Mallet Lords, all of these are acceptable forms of being one-shot in players’ minds.  They are very dodgeable attacks and abilities and getting hit by them is silly.  When modifiers come into play though (in this case especially waller, jailer, and vortex) these things that were once easy to handle, all of a sudden become a challenge.  A well timed vortex into a charge swing will end your life so will over estimating your time to get away from an arcane orb and then getting jailed next to it.  These things can surprise the player and even after experiencing a time or two and figuring out ways to prevent it from happening or to get out of them when they do, they still force players to stay on their toes and watch out for them.  When you start to add more than one type of this challenge to a fight for players to deal as well as the constant threat of taking too many normal hits that wittle down their health, things become hectic in a good way and the player is forced to grow and become better at the game to overcome them.  This provides a positve user experience.
                        So what kind of numbers provide for a solid and reasonable challenge?  The answer is all kinds!  First off, ping-ponging health is bad.  Taking hits should decrease health at a steady rate while healing should raise health at a slow one.  Getting hit by 1 or 2 hits should be able to be countered by healing, but allowing yourself to get hit constantly should begin to wear down you health, steadily bringing you closer and closer to death.  Your health versus monster damage should be crafted in such a way that the scare of a quick death from regular hits should never be there, but neither should you be able to ignore them.
                        The next teir of numbers should be those that are dangerous yet mostly avoidable.  A good example of this is the wasps in Act 2, it’s easy to dodge the slow moving bullets they fire, but when the screen becomes cluttered by them and other ablities come into play, the odds of dodgeing every one of them becomes quite low.  These bullets should be a significantly higher danger to you than a generic hit, but they should not massively chunk your health pool or kill you outright.  Getting hit by 1, 2, or even 3 shouldn't end the fight for you, but it should set you back in a way that you have to work to recover from it over a decent amount of time (say multiple uses of a CD healing ability).  Taking a few tics of plauged, a tic of desecrator, or a few hits of electrified are also good examples of this.
                        The last tier of numbers is those that are outright deadly to you.  They are numbers that should be extreme, maybe even to the point that no amount of gear would let you get hit by them.  These are the one-shot abilities or one-two combos such as jailer desecrator.  They keep players on their toes and keep up a constant level of excitement.  These types of numbers should always revolve around a player’s ability to easily avoid them and ways other than the abilties themselves should be found to increase the likelyhood of a player getting hit by them.
                        Creating numbers in this way does two things for a player.  The first thing it does is give players something to overcome, and allows them to learn how to.  The challenges are something players have to figure out how to deal with, be it through a careful eye or the use of an ability to negate or escape the danger.  Multiple levels of danger give them multiple things to deal with, and give them priorities on what to avoid.  They have to make choices on what is an acceptable risk or on what damage to take if things become unavoidable.  There is a costant, yet not overwhelming stream of information that players must process, and this keeps things exciting.
                        The second thing that these numbers do is give the player choices.  There is an absolutely amazing and beautiful amount of choice in class customization in Diablo 3 and by giving players some leeway in the numbers department; it allows them to pick a playstyle that suits them.  Maybe they want to go deeply into something heal based that and allows them survive more mistakes over time.  They could also decide to go the glass cannon build hoping to be able to defeat the enemies before they end up makeing 1 too many mistakes.  Perpahps they choose to go defensive so that they can surive making too many mistakes at once.  Kiting, close range, AoE, minion, cooldown, mobility, all kinds of builds begin to become viable and players have the freedom to choose how they want to play their character, even if it is not the most efficient way.

            Champion Challenges - And the Die Roll Says
                        Champion modifications are most likely Diablo 3's best way of creating a challenging experience.  Based on what you get they can be frustrating, easy, or downright impossible and this is a great thing.  It adds spice and variety to the gameplay and creates a heap of new situations for players to learn and overcome.  I also believe that there is no need for every combination to be balanced.  It's a good thing when the die rolls in your favor and you get an easy champ pack, and it’s just as good as well as flavorful when a pack's abilties work so well together to make it almost impossible, it gives players a goal for gear to overcome without forcing them to face that challenge.
                        The one problem with champion modifications in Inferno is that simply increasing the number champions can have from 3 to 4 is not enough (often times one of those modifications is ignorable anyways).  Inferno needs to offer something new that wasn't shown in the previous difficulties.  Players need a new challenge.  I believe that Inferno should have made the player face a larger variety of modifications; new ones should have been introduced.  Rather than cluttering things here, I will put an appendix at the end of my post where I will put ideas for new champion modifications that could be added to the Inferno difficulty
                        *As a last note, I feel that ALL unique (purple) enemies should be treated as champion packs in terms of number of abilities and randomness of them.

            Boss Battles - Dragon's Should be Epic
                        One of the most dissapointing things to me in Inferno was the bosses.  They didn't change one bit.  I went into the King Leoric fight eyes peeled, waiting for some new mechanic to appear and add new challenge to the fight.  Instead all I got was the same fight I had done many times before.  When the same thing happened on the Butcher I realized they weren't going to change and let my hope die.  It made me sad.
                        These are bosses in the hardest difficult in Di-freaking-ablo.  They should be epic!  They should challenge players.  Offer them a new challenge that causes them to come up with new strategies to defeat them.  The first time I fight any boss (not just the Act end ones) on Inferno difficulty I should not feel that they are easier than any champion pack I have faced, let alone many many times easier.  There needs to more.  There needs to be new.  Inferno bosses need to change.

            Tiered Multi-Act Progression - I Can Travel in Nine Dimensions
                        I don't remember why now but until a few weeks before Diablo 3's release, I believed that in Inferno difficulty all Acts would be set to the same difficulty.  Maybe it’s because I explained how I felt and still feel Diablo 3's final difficulty shoud work to a friend and they told me that was Blizzard's plan already and I believed him.  Whatever the reason, it did not turn out the way I had hoped so let me explain the way I envisioned the Acts would work Inferno.
                        Upon reaching Inferno, the progression by story design should have been thrown out of the window.  Players have gone through it several times already.  They have also reached the level cap so there is no longer a need for monsters level to increase with you over a controlled span of time and area of play.  With these things able to be tossed aside, designers have the opportunity to rework the progression flow of Inferno specifically for max level characters.  While there are many possiblities for this, one of the best designs (and how I would redesign Inferno) is what I like to call, Tiered Multi-Act Progression.
                        Considering how the Acts are designed, upon reaching Inferno players would be allowed to choose to progress through any Act.  The mobs in each Act would start at level 61 and as players progressed through the Act, most likely after each boss, the monster level would grow.  Not only would this give players the freedom of choice, but if they ever got stuck they would have the option to try to progress through a different Act rather than beat their heads against the only progression route avaiable to them.  Even once players had "beaten" the game, designing Inferno this way would seem to create more endgame content because players would have more than one Act choice to farm from.
                        *This design would also allow for more varied farming options like the one decribed in the Rewards for Exploration and Completion Section.

            Completely Random Enemies - Hey, You Weren't There Before
                        The title of this section really says it all.  Each zone in Inferno should be populated by a random set of enemies rather than the same ones all the time.  This would add an element of unpredicability that generates excitement in players and keeps them on their toes.  It adds variety, challenge, and freshness to Infero by creating moster set combinations that were not possible before and are new to deal with.  These are good things that add spice to the endgame content of Diablo 3.

            Inferno Redesign Summarized - TLDR
                        While difficulty is a good thing, it needs to be done in such a way as to not brick wall player progression, especially when a player’s true goal begins when progression ends.  A difficulty purely because of numbers is frustrating as well as boring and farming for gear that is not top-tier is more work than play so the difficulty of Inferno must be one of skill.  It must require players to think, to react, and challenge the player to overcome it, not their gear.  In the Diablo universe, gear must also be strong so whatever challenge created gear must allow you to overcome with greater ease.  Variety must be added to Inferno.  New champion modifications and random enemy sets populating zones instead of set ones would spice Inferno up and keep things feeling fresh and exciting.  Boss fights should be epic and so new mechanics should be introduced to them.  And last but not least, the choice on how to progress and through what should be given to the player, allowing them more choices and a tiered multi-act progression system works perfectly for this.

Creating Varied Endgame Content - You Mean I Can do Two Things?
            To begin to create endgame content for Diablo 3 we must first understand what the endgame goal of players is.  We already know this to be creating the ultimate character through gear and we know that the primary method of accomplishing this is farming (and that is what it should be Diablo games).  Knowing this, the question designers should ask themselves is this.  How to best make farming enjoyable?  In what ways can they design multple farming paths, multiple styles of farming, and a varitey of play experience while farming?  Figuring out multiple ways to answer this question will give players the ability to choose how to farm, and will keep a certain level of unpredictability, freshness, and excitement to a process that will be repeated thousands of times over by the average Diablo 3 player.

            Positive Incentives - Because Good is Always Better than Bad
                        When farming, players tend to gravitate towards the easiest and most efficient paths possible.  Case and point for this was ash pot farming in Act I, treasure goblin farming in Act II, and Resplendent Chest farming in Act III.  Though these things did need to be nerfed (not killing mobs should never been more rewarding than killing them), positive incentives should be given to players to encourage various ways of farming.  Nephalim Valor is a good example of this.  It discourages the old Diablo 2 magic find runs against a single mob and promotes the creation of paths leading up to boss kills through postive benefits and without nerfing the effciency of those mf runs.  Positive incentives like this open up more options and push players to involve themselves in more of Diablo 3's content.  I believe that more incentives could be created, turning even more of Diablo 3's content into endgame content.

            Rewards for Exploration and Completion - Discovering Vast New Lands
                        The immensity of Diablo 3's content is a beautiful thing.  There are still dungeons and events that I have not seen.  Npc's that I have not met.  There is so much out there for players to discover, but players will only encounter it when they decide to take a break from farming and endgame content.  I feel however, that it could be made to be part of it.  By creating a positive incentive for players to spend time exploring zones and finding all they have to offer, the endgame content of Diablo 3 could improve.  Another option of play and farming can be made.
                        Currently, the rewards for completeing events or exploring dungeons versus the time put into them are often just not worth it.  So what can we design that would give players more incentive to seek them out?  I believe the answer is fairly simple.  Every zone is spawned with X amount of champions, events, treasure goblins, and resplendent chests.
If we tallied up a zone, we would get the total number of "exploration items" and could use that number as a way to track a players completion of a zone.  Upon fully completing a zone, players would be able to recieve a blue quality item of their slot choice (maybe not weapons).  Upon completeing a defined section of an Act, or perhaps just a percentage of the whole Act, players would recieve a rare quality item of their slot choice.  The item level chances would be determined by what section of an Act you completed, or by what percentage mark of the Act you had reached.  This would open up a new type of farming, one where you can "hunt" to fill a specific equipment slot.  I believe that this bonus would encourage players to seek out and experience the immense amount of content put into Diablo 3 while still keeping things in the endgame mindset.  The incentive is not so high as to force out normal farming, but specific enough to catch the eye of players who know exactly what they want.
Preventing Farming Paths While Keeping Them Predictable - I Know It's a Box, but Whats Inside It?
                        Endgame content of a game getting static is not a good thing.  Creating ways for it to stay feeling fresh while keeping a certain level of predictability should be the goal.  Earlier in the Inferno section I mentioned that mob sets in zones should be completely random and this section is mostly about the same idea.  By allowing mobs to be randomized for zones and by creating a greater range of possible spawn points for champion packs, we accomplish the goal of preventing set in stone farm paths.  However, as a balance, players should be able to predict how many champion packs they are going to find in a zone (I believe it’s currently 2 - 3 in any zone).  By not knowing what they will find in terms of enemies, but knowing what they will find in terms of rewards in each zone, things are feeling fresh and new longer without having a negative impact on predicability.  As an added bonus, players would not restrict themeselves to X zone each run, but would feel able to choose any zone to do their farming in (yay for more player choice).

            Extreme Drop Chances - Unlimitted Power!
                        Gear is the primary source of endgame content for Diablo 3 as well as its longevity, so what better way to increase this than to add items beyond item level 63.  By throwing in some level 64 or 65 legendaries (and only legendaries in my opinion), and giving them extremely low drop chances, players would always have something to shoot for.  The thrill of just possibly finding them would drive players and the excitement of actually seeing one would be unmatched.  Players know that it is highely unlikely they will ever reach the absolute max potential of thier characters, but just that chance of getting that amazing item is enough to enthrall them.

            Perfectly Rolled Gear - Just One More Point Please!
                        This actually already exists in Diablo 3, but I felt I should just make a quick note of its postive impact.  The ability to find perfectly rolled gear (legendaries with max stats) comes with all the benefits listed in the above section.  It’s a great system and should continue to be used.

Challenges and Challenge Difficulties - Time for the Bonus Round
            Aside from just endgame content, bonus content is a good way to be able to add new content without causing a negative impact on existing content.  A good exmaple of bonus content is pretty much the current design of Inferno.  A difficulty where the numbers are tuned extremely high and progression through it is block frequently by things like gear checks.  However, this content would not drop loot; instead its purpose would be the challenge of completeing.  Perhaps maybe adding a set, one time, powerful, bound to account or character reward for completing it.  This difficulty could up hair-pulling hard because with no loot, it would not be considered a block to player's goals, only an extra challenge for players to tackle if they chose to.  There could even be several extra levels of difficulty as time goes on and players gear improves.  Other forms of bonus content could also be designed.  Special zones, be it serious or easter egg in nature.  Boss challenges (imagine fighting "Ultra Diablo" or multiple bosses at once) or survival modes could also be added as bonus content.  There are infinite ways to create content, and an easy way to keep it from negatively impacting current content is by offering it as a bonus with little or no reward save for the challenge itself.


In Closing – Yay, He’s Done Talking
            Once again my post has run very long, but I hope that you’ve enjoyed the read.  My goal was to provide some (preferably correct) insight into player’s goals and how to design content with them in mind.  I hope that I have accomplished this, provided food for thought, and come up with a few things that players would enjoy seeing.  If you read it all, I really thank you for your time!

Appendix A - Champion Modifications
            Strong – Makes normal attacks of monsters stronger.

            Blasting – Occasionally fires a medium speed projectile in the direction the mob is facing.  1 Shot for champions, 3 bullet spread shot for elites.

            Duelist – Upon entering combat with mob, creates a 100yd by 100yd arena, locking the player in with the pack.  (No way out but to kill or be killed)

            Erupting – Across a very large area centering on the monster, the ground will flash for a few seconds revealing a handful of safe zones.  After the time period ends, the ground will erupt for massive damage, forcing the player to reach one of the safe zones before it goes off.

            Pulsing – The champion will periodically pulse for low, unavoidable damage.

            Shifting – Periodically the mob will change its elemental weakness (denoted by color of the mob).  The mob will gain high resistances to anything other than this element but will also take increased damage from this element.  When hitting the champion, it will cause them to drop an orb (somewhat like health globes) that will temporarily change all damage you deal to that type.

            Rending – Getting hit by normal attacks from enemies with this modification will cause a stacking DoT to be placed on players.  As the damage grows, it will eventually become impossible to ignore, even deadly forcing players to back off for a bit and let it fall off.


No comments:

Post a Comment